Différences entre versions de « Zdenek Bazant »
Sauter à la navigation
Sauter à la recherche
| (2 versions intermédiaires par le même utilisateur non affichées) | |||
| Ligne 5 : | Ligne 5 : | ||
*[https://www.ae911truth.org/news/857-oh-the-irony-as-editor-of-the-journal-of-engineering-mechanics-zdenek-bazant-wrote-a-letter-encouraging-discussions He wrote a letter encouraging discussions] | *[https://www.ae911truth.org/news/857-oh-the-irony-as-editor-of-the-journal-of-engineering-mechanics-zdenek-bazant-wrote-a-letter-encouraging-discussions He wrote a letter encouraging discussions] | ||
*[https://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/TheMissingJolt7.pdf A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis (Graeme MacQueen et Tony Szamboti)] | *[https://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/TheMissingJolt7.pdf A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis (Graeme MacQueen et Tony Szamboti)] | ||
| + | *[https://www.ae911truth.org/news/907-angle-calls-out-bazant-at-citizens-forum Roland Angle calls out absurdity of Bažant’s hasty "pile driver" theory] | ||
| + | *[https://www.ae911truth.org/news/927-debunked-bazant-theory-protected-by-shameless-editors Debunked Bažant Theory Protected by Shameless Editors] | ||
| + | *[https://www.ae911truth.org/news/979-bazants-fraudulent-theory-exposed-the-mathematics-he-used-to-explain-the-twin-towers-collapse-is-wrong The mathematics he used to explain the Twin Towers Collapse is wrong] | ||
*[http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zdenek_Bazant Wikipédia] | *[http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zdenek_Bazant Wikipédia] | ||
*[http://wiki.reopen911.info/index.php/Scientifiques_défenseurs_de_la_VO Retour aux scientifiques défenseurs de la version officielle] | *[http://wiki.reopen911.info/index.php/Scientifiques_défenseurs_de_la_VO Retour aux scientifiques défenseurs de la version officielle] | ||
Version actuelle datée du 9 avril 2024 à 08:59
- Il lui a fallu 2 jours pour analyser l'effondrement des tours en regardant quelques vidéos Fast Science is bad
- WTC : Plus dure sera la chute
- The official account of the Twin Towers' destruction relies entirely on four papers coauthored by Zdeněk Bažant
- He wrote a letter encouraging discussions
- A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis (Graeme MacQueen et Tony Szamboti)
- Roland Angle calls out absurdity of Bažant’s hasty "pile driver" theory
- Debunked Bažant Theory Protected by Shameless Editors
- The mathematics he used to explain the Twin Towers Collapse is wrong
- Wikipédia