Différences entre versions de « Zdenek Bazant »
Sauter à la navigation
Sauter à la recherche
| Ligne 4 : | Ligne 4 : | ||
*[http://www.ae911truth.org/news/604-new-paper-on-wtc-collapses-adds-to-literature-refuting-progressive-collapse-theory The official account of the Twin Towers' destruction relies entirely on four papers coauthored by Zdeněk Bažant] | *[http://www.ae911truth.org/news/604-new-paper-on-wtc-collapses-adds-to-literature-refuting-progressive-collapse-theory The official account of the Twin Towers' destruction relies entirely on four papers coauthored by Zdeněk Bažant] | ||
*[https://www.ae911truth.org/news/857-oh-the-irony-as-editor-of-the-journal-of-engineering-mechanics-zdenek-bazant-wrote-a-letter-encouraging-discussions He wrote a letter encouraging discussions] | *[https://www.ae911truth.org/news/857-oh-the-irony-as-editor-of-the-journal-of-engineering-mechanics-zdenek-bazant-wrote-a-letter-encouraging-discussions He wrote a letter encouraging discussions] | ||
| + | *[https://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/TheMissingJolt7.pdf A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis (Graeme MacQueen et Tony Szamboti)] | ||
*[http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zdenek_Bazant Wikipédia] | *[http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zdenek_Bazant Wikipédia] | ||
*[http://wiki.reopen911.info/index.php/Scientifiques_défenseurs_de_la_VO Retour aux scientifiques défenseurs de la version officielle] | *[http://wiki.reopen911.info/index.php/Scientifiques_défenseurs_de_la_VO Retour aux scientifiques défenseurs de la version officielle] | ||
Version du 9 mars 2023 à 00:02
- Il lui a fallu 2 jours pour analyser l'effondrement des tours en regardant quelques vidéos Fast Science is bad
- WTC : Plus dure sera la chute
- The official account of the Twin Towers' destruction relies entirely on four papers coauthored by Zdeněk Bažant
- He wrote a letter encouraging discussions
- A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis (Graeme MacQueen et Tony Szamboti)
- Wikipédia